A recent study has uncovered a concerning health issue linked to wearable technology: smartwatch wristbands may contain harmful “forever chemicals” that could expose wearers to long-term risks. According to research published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, certain higher-priced wristbands made from fluorinated synthetic rubber are more likely to contain elevated levels of these chemicals, particularly perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA).
This revelation has raised alarm among scientists and health advocates, given the increasing popularity of smartwatches and fitness trackers. Nearly a fifth of Americans regularly wear these devices, often for prolonged periods. Here’s a detailed look at the findings and their implications.
What Are Forever Chemicals?
“Forever chemicals” is a term used to describe a class of human-made compounds known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These chemicals are prized for their ability to resist water, sweat, and oil, making them staples in products like:
- Stain-resistant textiles
- Menstrual products
- Fitness apparel
- Firefighting foams
PFAS are notorious for their durability, both in the environment and within the human body. While this resilience makes them useful, it also poses serious risks. Certain types of PFAS have been linked to illnesses such as cancer, liver damage, and immune system disorders.
Also Read: Apple to Introduce Satellite Texting in Smartwatches by 2025
Forever Chemicals in Smartwatch Bands
The study, led by researchers at the University of Notre Dame, analyzed 22 smartwatch wristbands from various brands and price ranges. The primary focus was to detect the presence of fluorine—a key indicator of PFAS—and to identify 20 specific types of these chemicals.
The findings revealed:
- Fluoroelastomer Bands: All 13 wristbands advertised as being made from fluoroelastomers contained fluorine.
- Non-Advertised Bands: Two of the nine wristbands not marketed as containing fluoroelastomers also had detectable fluorine.
- Higher Costs Correlate with Higher PFAS: Wristbands priced above $30 showed significantly higher concentrations of fluorine compared to those costing less than $15.
The most commonly detected PFAS was PFHxA, found in nine out of the 22 wristbands. Concentrations ranged from a median of 800 parts per billion (ppb) to more than 16,000 ppb in one sample.
Health Risks of PFAS
While the study did not confirm how readily PFHxA transfers into the skin, it highlighted potential concerns. PFAS in wearable products could provide a direct route for these chemicals to enter the body. However, regulatory frameworks have yet to address this issue comprehensively:
- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently limits PFAS exposure only in drinking water, not in consumer products.
- To date, no federal safety thresholds exist for PFAS absorbed through the skin.
Lead author Alyssa Wicks emphasized the uncertainty surrounding PFHxA’s ability to penetrate the skin but urged caution, suggesting consumers opt for silicone wristbands as a safer alternative.
Also Read: Garmin Smartwatch Users Face Widespread Glitches and Crashes
Broader Implications for Wearable Tech
This study is part of a growing body of research examining PFAS in everyday products. A 2023 study on cosmetics found median PFAS concentrations of 200 ppb—significantly lower than the levels observed in some smartwatch wristbands.
According to Graham Peaslee, a PFAS expert and nuclear physicist at Notre Dame, the high concentrations detected in these wristbands are unprecedented for wearable items.
“This discovery stands out because of the very high concentrations of one type of forever chemical found in items that are in prolonged contact with our skin,” Peaslee explained.
The findings underscore the need for more robust regulations and consumer awareness regarding PFAS in wearable technology and other products.
Recommendations for Consumers
To minimize exposure to PFAS, the researchers offered the following advice:
- Opt for Silicone Wristbands: These are generally free of PFAS and provide a safer alternative to fluoroelastomer bands.
- Read Product Descriptions: Avoid wristbands explicitly marketed as containing fluoroelastomers.
- Choose Lower-Cost Options: Less expensive wristbands tend to contain lower levels of fluorine.
Also Read: Tesla Apple Watch App Turns Your Watch Into a Car Key
The Path Forward
The study has sparked calls for further investigation into the health risks posed by PFAS in consumer products. Researchers believe that understanding the transferability of PFAS into the skin is critical for assessing the full scope of these risks.
Meanwhile, environmental and health advocates are urging policymakers to expand regulatory oversight of PFAS beyond drinking water to include wearable products and other consumer goods.
This study highlights the hidden risks associated with wearable technology and emphasizes the importance of informed consumer choices in mitigating exposure to harmful chemicals.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What are forever chemicals?
Forever chemicals, or PFAS, are human-made compounds known for their resistance to water, oil, and heat. They persist in the environment and the human body.
2. Why are PFAS found in smartwatch wristbands?
Manufacturers use PFAS in wristbands for their durability, sweat resistance, and ability to prevent discoloration.
3. Are all smartwatch wristbands harmful?
Not all wristbands contain PFAS. Silicone wristbands are generally considered safer than those made from fluoroelastomers.
4. What is PFHxA?
PFHxA is a specific type of PFAS commonly found in higher-priced smartwatch wristbands. It is linked to potential health concerns.
5. How can PFAS affect health?
Some PFAS have been associated with cancer, liver damage, immune system issues, and other serious illnesses.
6. Are there regulations for PFAS in wristbands?
Currently, no federal regulations address PFAS exposure through the skin. The EPA only regulates PFAS in drinking water.
7. How can I avoid PFAS in smartwatch wristbands?
Opt for wristbands made from silicone and avoid products marketed as containing fluoroelastomers.
8. Do more expensive wristbands pose higher risks?
Yes, the study found that wristbands costing more than $30 often contain higher levels of PFAS compared to cheaper options.
9. What should manufacturers do to address this issue?
Manufacturers should explore alternative materials and improve transparency regarding the chemical composition of their products.
10. What’s next in PFAS research?
Future studies aim to understand how PFAS transfer into the skin and assess their long-term health impacts.